The classification process is done according a quantitative and qualitative assessment of two parameters: the consistency (C) of the observation and the residual strangeness (E) after investigation.
Strangeness (E): This is the measure of the residual strangeness after comparison with known phenomena hypotheses.
Consistency (C): This is the product of the quantity and the reliability of the data submitted and collected during the investigation. The objectivity of this data is weighted according to a specific table, part of the GEIPAN methodology.
Classification categories:
Classification A: Phenomenon perfectly identified after investigation.
Classification B: Phenomenon probably identified after investigation.
Classification C: Phenomenon not identified due to lack of data or information.
Classification D: Phenomenon not identified after investigation.
A revisit process, or a new analysis, of cases C and D may be conducted if new information related to these cases is communicated to GEIPAN after the initial investigation.
No, GEIPAN is a technical department of CNES (Centre National d’Études Spatiales), a public, industrial and commercial institute in charge of the definition and implementation of the French space policy. CNES operates under the supervision of the French government; Economy & Finance, Education & Research and the Defense Ministries
GEIPAN is integrated within CNES as an expertise department.